One of my subscribers, Pat Burns of Edgewater, NJ, a
lifelong Catholic, spoke out in a Letter to the Editor of the New York Times, which
was printed in the April 20 edition of the paper as follows:
A Lifelong Catholic
Pays Tribute to the Nuns
To the Editor:
Re “Vatican Reprimands a Group of U.S. Nuns and Plans Changes” (news article,
April 19):
I am a lifelong
Catholic, 80-plus years, and will die a Catholic. But I will not be silent in
my support of the tireless work and dedication of the wonderful nuns who serve
the poor and the helpless, the sick and infirm, the children and elderly, who
even go to jail for the cause of protesting the evil of war and nuclear threats
to humanity and the world.
I will speak out
loudly in protest at the Vatican document’s citing of nuns for, as your article
says, focusing “too much on poverty and economic injustice, while keeping
‘silent’ on abortion and same-sex marriage.”
How can there ever be
too much focus on poverty and economic injustice? And how can the Vatican
justly rebuke women busy selflessly carrying out Christ’s work caring for the
least of our brethren for being silent on abortion and homosexuality, while for
decades bishops were silent about grave sins against the innocent in their
care?
Herewith is my tribute
to the thousands of nuns who deserve our respect and admiration. I am having
shirts made up for my Catholic and non-Catholic friends and family to wear that
state, "I’m with her!”
Upon seeing the letter I wrote to Ms. Burns:
Allow me to congratulate you on the excellent letter entitled:
"A Lifelong Catholic Pays Tribute to the Nuns" that was published by
the New York Times today. As always your voice is a beacon of light.
In case you haven’t seen it, the Washington Post’s E. J.
Dione, himself a life-long Catholic, also published an excellent article on
the subject, which I quote below:
Catholic Bishops’
double message
I identify entirely
with my friend and colleague Melinda Hennenberger’s excellent take
on the Vatican’s crackdown on
American nuns. Indeed, I also liked what one commenter on her piece
had to say: “The American Bishops should be washing the feet of American nuns
and sisters!” Actually, all of us who are Catholic should honor the nuns. The
Church would be lost without them. I hope to have more to say on this unfortunate
Vatican statement next week.
It’s especially odd
that a criticism of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious for apparently
placing too much emphasis on Catholic social teaching came in the same week
that the Bishops offered strong
criticism of Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget (without mentioning Ryan by
name). A letter
signed by Bishop Stephen E. Blaire on behalf of his fellow prelates called on
Congress to “protect essential programs that serve poor and hungry people over
subsidies that assist large and relatively well-off agricultural enterprises.”
He also said: “Cuts to nutrition programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable
seniors and workers who cannot find employment. These cuts are unjustified and
wrong.”
There is a real
struggle going on in the Church right now between conservatives, who seem
intent on making President Obama a target and downplaying the Church’s social
mission, and more progressive Catholics, who think the Church should be placing
even more emphasis on social justice and issue more emphatic rejections of
budget cuts along the lines of Bishop Blaire’s letter. Conservatives have had
the upper hand over the last few months, but Bishop Blaire’s statement can be
seen in part as a response to the pushback from Catholic liberals who wondered
where the Bishops have been in the ongoing budget fight. (Blaire, it should be
said, has a strong social justice commitment of his own.)
My hunch is that the
attack on the nuns will bring a lot more blowback from progressive Catholics.
Up to now, Catholic conservatives have been especially aggressive in pushing
the Bishops’ Conference to the right. The Bishops will now be getting a lot
more pressure from Catholics on the other side. I think conservatives will
ultimately regret targeting the sisters. The nuns have a great many friends in
the Church.
The article can be found here.
I then added:
As a non-Catholic, but a keen observer of the Church, I am
dismayed at the constant chipping away of the reforms of the Second Vatican
Council under Pope John XXIII, who, unfortunately, did not enshrine his legacy
by appointing many like minded Cardinals.
I am also surprised that the church leaders, in the Vatican
and in the US bishops conference are not more meek in their attack on the
church’s mission to aid, assist and protect the poor, particularly after the
sex sandals that engulfed and are still engulfing the Bishops, though, I am
glad to note that Bishop Stephen P. Blair called on Congress to “protect
essential programs that serve poor and hungry people over subsidies that assist
large and relatively well-off agricultural enterprises.”
The real shame is the media, who give far more coverage to
the churches unfortunate positions, and very little to positives such as the
sisters and Bishop Stephen P. Blair's statement.
As in any institution, and indeed in mankind itself, the
battle between good and evil is never-ending.
Comments, questions, or
corrections, are welcome and will be responded to and distributed with
attribution, unless the writer requests that he/she not be identified.
No comments:
Post a Comment