Thursday, May 22, 2008

Who Is McCain?

With the Presidential election moving into full swing, I believe it to be appropriate to take a look at the presumptive Republican nominee for President, John McCain.

Who is John McCain? He keeps being described as a war hero. What is the basis for that?

In October of 1967, more than forty years ago, while on a bombing run over Hanoi, his A-4 Skyhawk was hit by surface-to-air missiles; for five and a half years, he would be a prisoner of war. When his captors realized that he was the son of the Commander in Chief Pacific (Cincpac), Admiral John McCain, Jr., they offered to release him ahead of other POWs as a gesture of goodwill. He refused the offer, resulting in even harsher treatment from his guards. 

However, it now appears that a senior officer among the prisoners ordered him to refuse the offer. Thus if McCain had accepted the offer, he would have disobeyed a direct order from a superior and been subject to court marshal. It is hardly heroic to obey an order in the military. Worse, after four days, McCain made an anti-American propaganda "confession.” McCain later said, “everyone has their breaking point” and everyone does, but most prisoners of war did not break.

He spent five years in captivity and was tortured, but so were many others who have never claimed to be heroes, and who never used that to build careers for themselves. McCain deserves sympathy for the pain that was inflicted on him by his Vietnamese captors, but it does not make him a hero.

But how did he get where he is now. He was the son and grandson of four-star admirals. Many expected that he would follow in their footsteps. But he graduated fifth from the bottom of the class of 1958. Because of the influence of his family of famous Admirals, McCain was leapfrogged ahead of more qualified applicants and granted a coveted slot to be trained as a navy pilot. 

On July 3, 1965 McCain married Carol Shepp. In 1980 he divorced her. Only a month after the divorce, McCain married Cindy Lou Hensley, heiress to Phoenix-based Hensley & Co., the nation's second-largest Anheuser-Busch distributor. McCain followed his young, millionaires wife back to Arizona where her father helped catapult McCain into politics. Today, Cindy Hensley McCain is chairwoman of Hensley's board of directors. Hensley and Company financial reports show assets worth a minimum of $28 million for the McCains (Source).

McCain has built a reputation for rectitude, but his record there is more mixed then is generally realized. McCain was one of the Keating five. Keating was convicted of racketeering and fraud in both state and federal court after his Lincoln Savings & Loan collapsed, costing the taxpayers $3.4 billion. McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after Keating gave McCain at least $112,00 in contributions. In the mid-1980s, McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas. McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal." 

In the Senate McCain created a reputation as a maverick, best known for the McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act of 2002, but now that he is running for the Presidency he promises to appoint judges to the Supreme Court like Roberts, Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Scalia, who have been emasculating the act with their decisions.

Furthermore, it now appears that McCain’s campaign is well stocked with lobbyists whose interests one can expect he would protect, just as Bush did. To his embarrassment this has been disclosed and so McCain is now trying to purge them. It is too late. His connections and his allegiances have been revealed.

He voted against the temporary Bush tax cut, on the ground that it was a give-away to the rich and would cause huge deficits, but now as a presidential candidate he insists that we must make it permanent.

He tries to disassociate himself from Bush, but when Bush attacked Obama in an address to the Israeli Knesset equating the willingness to negotiate with enemies with appeasement of Hitler, McCain joined Bush in the smear, ignoring the fact that all previous Presidents negotiated with our adversaries from Nixon and China, To Kennedy and Khrushchev, to Reagan and Gorbachev to Bush and North Korea. He ignores Churchill’s famous quote, “To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war,” which remarks were made at a White House luncheon on June 26, 1954. 

In South Carolina, McCain was asked when he thought the US Military might "send an air mail message to Tehran. McCain began his answer by changing the words to a popular Beach Boys song, “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran,” he sang to the tune of Barbara Ann. He seems to have arrived at a point where he makes Bush sound responsible.

He also tried to disassociate himself from Bush by criticizing Bush for the way the Katrina disaster was handled by saying that unlike Bush he would not have flown over the area, but rather would have landed. I wonder how many of the people who lost their homes would be reassured by knowing that the difference between Bush’s neglect and McCain’s is that McCain would have visited them and looked upon their misery first hand.

If McCain was ever the maverick that he has presented himself to be, which is doubtful, he is not that man any longer. 

There is a lot more to be said, but that will wait for another time.

12 comments:

Albert Nekimken of Vienna, Virginia said...

Thanks for sharing your research. I was aware of some of these details, but not all, by any means. I wasn’t planning to vote for McCain before reading your message and this conviction is now even stronger.
However, I fear that should you shine the spotlight on Obama and Hillary Clinton you might find similar moral and political lapses.

Ramesh Patel of Windsor, Connecticut said...

Thank you Emil
I am glad that you resumed these commentaries/writing
Interesting ....Who Is McCain
....will wait for your next posting.

Bruno Lederer of Stamford, Conn. said...

Very excellent indictment of McCain and his policies and background. I suggest you send a copy of this to the Obama campaign and to the Democratic National Committee. You might give them some good ideas for the campaign. Congratulations on finishing your memoirs. I hope you'll send me an autographed first edition.
Welcome back.

Nicole Scheller of Lawrenceville, N.J. said...

Be careful casting dispersions on POWs. We use the term hero to refer to lots of people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time, (World Trade Center victims, etc.) let alone people who endured torture over prolonged periods of time. I don't think attacking him for his war record is wise. It is legitimate (unlike Bush's) and not likely to win any converts only cause staunch defense by both his allies and perhaps even some fence-sitters. I think it is more important to focus on the fact that he is not this independent thinking maverick who's managed to convince many moderates that he's not a right wing nut. That's the really scary thing. Many middle of the road folks think he's actually one of them.

Frank Diprima of Morristown, NJ said...

Thanks, Emil. I think McCain is a befuddled old hypocrite of ordinary intelligence that says one thing and does another, but I have not studied his biography. In 1981, when he went into politics, he was already 45. What was he doing in the ten years after his release from captivity -- was he still in the Navy flying around? Those are ten crucial years.

Barrie Grant Englewood, NJ said...

Although I agree with most of what you have to say I am a little taken back with the slashing attack you made on McCain's military service. It reminds me of the "Swift Boat" attacks. Just stick to the facts on his military record.There is so much to attack him on his political record, let us debate the issues he presents not his family and military service.

Herb Reiner of Cedar Grove, New Jersey said...

I found your detailed backgrounder on John McCain most informative. Though I fervently hope he does not become President, I think, in all fairness, we should give him credit for his critiques of our shameful practices of waterboarding and torture, his original critique of the Bush tax cuts and his attempts to reform the political process with McCain-Feingold etc. My sense is that somewhere deep inside McCain is a core of decency that he has decided to ignore for political advantage. That being said, anyone who repeatedly confuses Shia and Sunni and states that Sunni insurgents are being armed by Iran, has no business running for President. Fox News excused this misspeak with a “senior moment.” Unfortunately leaders with senior moments can lead us to disaster as easily as leaders who deceive. With the economy getting steadily worse, and the country fed up with the War, it is hard to see how McCain could hold his own in a debate with Obama.
Still Obama’s name, race and natural elegance (“elitism”) can be used against him, and if Hillary is not on the ticket, some of her supporters will vote for McCain just for spite or so that that she can run in 2012. Hillary just said she is staying in the race in case the unthinkable happens (i.e. why should she drop out before Obama is assassinated?) Let’s just hope her words don’t inspire it!
Right now the timely topic is not McCain, but how do we stop the Clintons from destroying the Democratic party.

Dr. Joel Etra Norwich, Conn. said...

Well done!
Sorry, I can't find anything to disagree with.

Dr. Joel Etra of Norwich, Conn. said...

Interesting discussion about whether or not we can comment on a POW's war record and status as a hero.
The opinions you received were correct as our environment of political correctness shields such a record. What bothers me about this is that if it is OK for his campaign to use his war record to convince us of his character, it must be OK for us to debate it. I don't like sacred cows when we are supposed to be making objective decisions. If they don't want it discussed, don't bring it into the argument.

Bruno Lederer of of Stamford, Conn. said...

After reading all the comments I must say that I agree with Nicole that
attacking McCain's war record is a losing proposition, especially since you indicate in response the your anonymous contributor that the reference to McCain's superior officer cannot be authenticated. I recall that the Iran hostages were given a ticker tape parade on Broadway and hailed as heroes, although they were actually victims.

Nicole Scheller of Lawrenceville, N.J. said...

I urge all to read an article on McCain which appeared in the New Yorker which can be found at:
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2008/05/26/080526taco_talk_toobin/?yrail

Arthur Greenbaum of Manhattan, NY said...

You and I have remarkably similar views on politics. Accordingly, I welcome all of your hard work which generally convinces me that my views are correct. In addition, I learn a lot of new stuff. Of course, if I disagree with you, I reserve the right to explain why you are wrong.
Incidentally, I just read Ted Sorensen’s memoir titled COUNSELOR. It was superb because of
the subject matter, his extraordinary mastery of details and insights, the fact that he and I agree on most things, and the excellence of the writing.